Week 14 Reading Reflection

1) I was surprised to read about the differences between corporate entrepreneurship and innovation. I knew coming into this class that there were similarities and differences between the two but to have them both really defined in front of me opened my eyes. I thought entrepreneurship is type of innovation- with more of an "umph" to it, but after reading the definitions for each, this misconception was expelled in my mind. They are actually two different ideas, and most people can't separate that in their heads (like me). The differences between the two concepts really made me think and separate these ideas into two categories, not just an extension of one into the other.

2) I was confused about what really is an I-team and what their purpose is. I understand that the company needs innovators that stay away from daily activities, but the definition the book gives throws me off of what they do on a day-to-day basis. The definition of I-team states "two or more people who formally create and share ownership of a new organization". Based on that definition alone, I wouldn't understand these people are innovators seeking to assist the firm in new directions. I just think the book could have been a little more clearer in describing the role of an I-team and what the work of an I-team looks like. This clarification could have really helped me understand this chunk of the chapter. 

3) I would ask the author what are some ways to cultivate organizational behaviors and rituals uplifting those who fail? The book discusses learning from failure, so I was wondering how a firm can strengthen this area of their work force to not put down failure but actually embrace it and learn from it?

I would also ask the author if he/she has personally seen movements toward ecopreneurship? I understand the world is moving toward a more green and eco-friendly society, but with my experiences, I haven't seen that many ventures really make an impact in the entrepreneurial world with this new way of thinking.

4) I think the author is wrong about his/her description of benefit corporations and B corporations. He/she states that "the terms are often used interchangeably" leading me to believe they are the same thing. However, then the author goes on to say that they "have a few important differences". I just don't think the author should spend as much time as he/she did on explaining what the differences between these two corporations are if he/she is going to contradict each other in the verbiage.